home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1993
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- D-1271 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL TIMOTHY BAILEY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- Timothy Bailey, of Portland, Oregon, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Oregon
-
- and this Court by order of May 24, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Michael Timothy Bailey from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael Timothy Bailey
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1272 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEOFFREY T. WILLIAMS, SR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Geoffrey
-
- T. Williams, Sr., of Fairfax, Virginia, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Virginia and this Court by order of June 14, 1993,
-
- having suspended the said Geoffrey T. Williams, Sr. from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Geoffrey T. Williams,
-
- Sr., be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1276 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM P. TEEVENS
-
- It having been reported to the Court that William
-
- P. Teevens, of Rapid City, South Dakota, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of North Dakota and this Court by order of June 14,
-
- 1993, having suspended the said William P. Teevens from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said William P. Teevens be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1277 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT P. GOLDBERG
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Robert P.
-
- Goldberg, of Honolulu, Hawaii, has been suspended from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Hawaii and
-
- this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended
-
- the said Robert P. Goldberg from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him
-
- to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Robert P. Goldberg be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1280 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GEORGE F. WOOD
-
- It having been reported to the Court that George F.
-
- Wood, of Sanford, Maine, has been disbarred from the
-
- practice of law by the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
-
- and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said George F. Wood from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said George F. Wood be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1284 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER M. ROSENBERG
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Roger M.
-
- Rosenberg, of Mineola, New York, has resigned from the
-
- practice of law before the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, Second Judicial Department and this
-
- Court by order of July 22, 1993, having suspended the
-
- said Roger M. Rosenberg from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to
-
- show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Roger M. Rosenberg be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1285 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARC HARVEY SLIFFMAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Marc
-
- Harvey Sliffman, of Wheaton, Maryland, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Court of
-
- Appeals of Maryland and this Court by order of July 22,
-
- 1993, having suspended the said Marc Harvey Sliffman
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and directed that
-
- a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Marc Harvey Sliffman be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1287 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES A. HELINGER, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that James A.
-
- Helinger, Jr., of Clearwater, Florida, has been
-
- suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Florida and this Court by order of July 22, 1993,
-
- having suspended the said James A. Helinger, Jr., from
-
- the practice of law in this Court and directed that a
-
- rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not
-
- be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said James A. Helinger, Jr.,
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
- D-1289 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SHELLEY J. LASHKOWITZ
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Shelley
-
- J. Lashkowitz, of Denver, Colorado, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of North
-
- Dakota and this Court by order of July 22, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Shelley J. Lashkowitz from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Shelley J. Lashkowitz
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1299 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN S. MATTHEWS
-
- It is ordered that John S. Matthews, of Tampa,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1300 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PETER R. STROMER
-
- It is ordered that Peter R. Stromer, of San Jose,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1301 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN MILTON POHLMANN
-
- It is ordered that John Milton Pohlmann, of
-
- Lafayette, California, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1302 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LINDA ANTIONETTE WILLIS
-
- It is ordered that Linda Antionette Willis, of
-
- Cleveland, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1303 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL JOSEPH BLAKE
-
- It is ordered that Michael Joseph Blake, of
-
- Dearborn Heights, Michigan, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1304 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS L. KUMMER
-
- It is ordered that Thomas L. Kummer, of Reno,
-
- Nevada, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1305 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LOUIS MICHAEL THRASHER
-
- It is ordered that Louis Michael Thrasher, of
-
- Lincoln, Nebraska, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1306 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN I. ROGERS, III
-
- It is ordered that John I. Rogers, III, of
-
- Bennettsville, South Carolina, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1307 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY N. SHENBERG
-
- It is ordered that Harvey N. Shenberg, of South
-
- Miami, Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1308 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID GOODHART
-
- It is ordered that David Goodhart, of Miami,
-
- Florida, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1309 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN E. SHANK
-
- It is ordered that John E. Shank, of Cross Lanes,
-
- West Virginia, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1310 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BERTRAM ZWEIBON
-
- It is ordered that Bertram Zweibon, of New York,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1311 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF OMAR Z. GHOBASHY
-
- It is ordered that Omar Z. Ghobashy, of New York,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1312 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JACOB RABINOWITZ
-
- It is ordered that Jacob Rabinowitz, of Brooklyn,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1313 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LEONARD HOWARD RUBIN
-
- It is ordered that Leonard Howard Rubin, of
-
- Tarrytown, New York, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1314 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SEYMOUR BROWN
-
- It is ordered that Seymour Brown, of New York, New
-
- York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 92-74 DEPT. OF REVENUE OF OREGON V. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.
-
- 92-854 CENTRAL BANK OF DENVER V. FIRST INTERSTATE BANK, ET AL.
-
- 92-1239 J. E. B. v. T. B.
-
- The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument are granted.
-
- 92-97 NORTHWEST AIRLINES, ET AL. V. KENT CTY., MICHIGAN, ET AL.
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument is granted. Justice Blackmun took no
-
- part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
-
-
-
-
-
- 92-780 NOW, INC., ET AL. V. SCHEIDLER, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Legal Defense for Unborn Children for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is denied. The
-
- motion of Alan Ernest to allow counsel to represent
-
- children unborn and born alive is denied. The motion of
-
- the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral
-
- argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is
-
- granted. The motion of respondent Monica Migliorino for
-
- divided argument and for additional time for oral
-
- argument is denied.
-
- 92-1223 DEPT. OF DEFENSE, ET AL. V. FLRA, ET AL.
-
- The motion of respondent American Federation of
-
- Government Employees, AFL-CIO, for leave to file motion
-
- for divided argument and for divided argument is denied.
-
- 92-1370 BFP V. RTC, RECEIVER OF IMPERIAL
-
- The motion of respondents Paul Osborne, et al. for
-
- divided argument is granted.
-
- 92-1500 CASPARI, SUPT., ET AL. V. BOHLEN, CHRISTOPHER
-
- The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate
-
- in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided
-
- argument is granted.
-
- 92-1639 CHICAGO, ET AL. V. ENVTL. DEFENSE FUND, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioners to dispense with printing
-
- the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 92-6281 HAGEN, ROBERT V. UTAH
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument is granted. The motion of Council of
-
- State Governments, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted.
-
- 92-8579 ELDER, CHARLES K. V. HOLLOWAY, R. D., ET AL.
-
- The motion of American Bar Association for leave to
-
- file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
-
- ASSIGNMENT ORDER
-
- An order of the Chief Justice designating and
-
- assigning Justice Powell (Retired) to perform judicial
-
- duties in the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Fourth Circuit during the period from September 27,
-
- 1993, through June 10, 1994, and for such time as may
-
- be required to complete unfinished business, pursuant
-
- to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 294 (a), is ordered entered on the
-
- minutes of this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 295.
-
-
-
-
-